Malicious Prosecution Lawsuits Explained

What is “malicious prosecution?”  This article will help answer that question. First, it’s important to distinguish between causes of action brought under state law and those brought under federal law.  The distinction is important because for state law claims for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove malice, that is, “ill will,” or an intent to harm.  But for federal claims, as for example under 42 USC § 1983, there is no requirement that the plaintiff show malice.   A federal cause of action for “malicious prosecution” is therefore somewhat misleadingly named.  It would be more accurate to refer to this claim as “wrongful prosecution,” meaning a criminal prosecution lacking in probable cause. 

         The elements of malicious prosecution in Tennessee, Kentucky, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals are set forth below.

Malicious Prosecution in Tennessee

         The elements of malicious prosecution in Tennessee are (1) the defendant brought a lawsuit against the plaintiff without probable cause; (2) the defendant brought the lawsuit with malice; and (3) the lawsuit terminated in favor of the plaintiff.  Green v. Campbell Cty., Tennessee, 352 F. Supp. 3d 860, 873 (E.D. Tenn. 2018)

Malicious Prosecution in Kentucky

         The law generally disfavors the tort of malicious prosecution because “all persons [should] be able to freely resort to the courts for redress of a wrong[.]” Raine v. Drasin, 621 S.W.2d 895, 899 (Ky. 1981). As a result, claimants alleging malicious prosecution must strictly comply with each element of the tort.  Id. (citing Davis v. Brady, 218 Ky. 384, 291 S.W. 412 (1927)). To prevail on a claim of malicious prosecution, the claimant must prove the following elements:

(1) the institution or continuation of original judicial proceedings, either civil or criminal, or of administrative or disciplinary proceedings, (2) by, or at the instance, of the plaintiff, (3) the termination of such proceedings in defendant’s favor, (4) malice in the institution of such proceeding, (5) want or lack of probable cause for the proceeding, and (6) the suffering of damage as a result of the proceeding.  Garcia v. Whitaker, 400 S.W.3d 270, 274 (Ky. 2013)

Malicious Prosecution in Federal Court

         Under Sixth Circuit precedent, the plaintiff must prove the following to be successful on a § 1983 malicious prosecution claim: (1) the defendants were part of the decision to initiate a criminal prosecution against the plaintiff; (2) the criminal prosecution lacked probable cause; (3) the plaintiff suffered a deprivation of liberty as a result of the legal proceeding; and (4) the criminal prosecution was resolved in the plaintiff’s favor. Sykes v. Anderson, 625 F.3d 294, 308 (6th Cir. 2010)

Generally, our civil rights lawyers will bring malicious prosecution claims against state actors under federal law.  An example of this sort of case was our recent success in the “Operation Candy Crush” litigation, in which we secured a $1.3 million settlement for several individuals who were wrongfully arrested.   But it’s worth noting that the state law claim of malicious prosecution does not require that the defendant be a state actor.  It is possible to bring a malicious prosecution against a private individual under state law.   These cases are very difficult, however, because they require the showing of “malice,” rather than mere negligence. 

         If you or a loved one has suffered from malicious prosecution, call the civil rights lawyers at DRS Law today.

We've Helped Thousands of People Just Like You

We are known for getting life-changing results and fighting to make our communities safer.

Why Choose Us As Your  Attorney?

With us on your side, you can focus on what’s most important – your recovery.

Decades Of Experience

Decades Of Experience

Our Nashville personal injury attorneys have over 75 years of combined practice handling cases involving personal injury, medical malpractice, civil rights, medical device lawsuits, wrongful death, and more.

Excellent Reputation

Excellent Reputation

DRS Law is a well-respected personal injury law firm based in Nashville. Our lawyers have  been selected as a Mid-South Super Lawyer, named one of the Top    100 attorneys in Tennessee in all fields of practice, and is included in the Best Lawyers in America guidebook.

Small Case Volume

Small Case Volume

Unlike many Nashville firms that handle a large volume of cases, we concentrate on a select few cases. With this, our attorneys ensure that every step is taken to obtain the most favorable outcomes for our clients.

We Prepare For Trial

We Prepare For Trial

Every case is meticulously prepared for trial by our trial team and support staff in order to maximize the recovery for our client, whether by settlement or trial verdict. Our proven track record of success has resulted in multi-million-dollar settlements and judgments.

Get Your Free Consultation

Click Here to Submit Your Case